In this episode, Marty Becker walks through a real retirement income case study involving a married couple who recently met with an advisor at Fidelity. The couple is fully retiring within the next year and needs $10,000 per month in guaranteed income on top of Social Security.
Marty breaks down their current portfolio, explains why a 70/30 stock-to-bond mix and a 4% withdrawal rate can create long-term risk, and shows how sequence of returns can impact retirement outcomes—especially when one spouse is much younger.
The episode compares a traditional single premium immediate annuity recommendation with a more advanced strategy using multiple annuities. Marty explains how both approaches provide the same lifetime income guarantees, but how a multi-annuity strategy can reduce the amount of capital required while improving income reliability, lowering withdrawal rates, and increasing discretionary assets.
You’ll also learn:
Why worst-case and best-case scenarios matter in retirement planning
How guaranteed income changes withdrawal rates and income reliability
The pros and cons of simplicity versus efficiency in annuity strategies
When a multi-annuity approach works best, and who it may not be right for
This episode is ideal for retirees or near-retirees who are evaluating annuity recommendations from large firms like Fidelity and want to understand if there is a smarter, more efficient way to generate lifetime income.
To learn more about annuities and see if a strategy like this fits your situation, visit atlasannuity.com to watch the “20% More Spendable Income in Retirement” video series or schedule a short Zoom call to get your questions answered.
By gaining a deeper understanding of different annuity options and recognizing the pitfalls of overly optimistic financial projections, retirees can make decisions that protect...
Are dividend-paying stocks really a reliable source of retirement income, or are they riskier than they seem? In this episode, we break down income...
Most retirees assume TIPS and MYGAs are basically the same thing. Both are conservative. Both preserve your principal. Both appeal to people who want...